SMN NEWS TEAM
User Rating: 
/ 1
Philipsburg:— The Landsrecherche is now working on the Election Fraud case that involves the United Peoples Party leader Theodore Heyliger, three police officers, and a civil servant working at the Philipsburg Police Station.
SMN News broke the story over two years ago about the officers who took a police vehicle in 2010 and went to the United Peoples Party campaign headquarters in Pointe Blanche and picked up four envelopes each containing $300.00 for the officers who according to information provided to SMN News collected the monies from the UP leader in exchange for their votes. Three of the four law enforcement workers decided to cheat one of their colleagues by opening the envelope that was meant for him/her and shared the monies among themselves. The greed on the part of the three cops caused a huge argument inside the Police Station shortly after the incident occurred. The argument is what led the Police Management team led by Chief Commissioner of Police Peter de Witte to order an internal investigation.
SMN News learnt that the four culprits working as law enforcement officers confessed to Police Internal Affairs that they were paid monies in exchange for their votes. That file was submitted to the Landsrecherche for further investigation and possible prosecution but the file was placed on the shelves of the Landsrecherche and was not touched.
SMN News learnt that the case was not investigated because of political influence because the UP/DP Government was supported by one Independent Member who held the Justice portfolio.
On several occasions SMN News asked about the election fraud case which is long overdue and each time the Prosecutor’s Office would say the case is not set as one of their priority cases and another excuse was that the Landsrecherche was short staffed.
On Monday SMN News contacted Chief Prosecutor Hans Mos for an update on the case because we learnt that the detectives working at the Landsrecherche recently started to work on the case, Mos confirmed on Monday that indeed the case is now being investigated but declined to say how far the investigation is.
Draft Report on Piranha Investigation not completed.
SMN News also asked Chief Prosecutor Hans Mos for an update on the Piranha investigation that landed former Minister of Finance Hiro Shigemoto in pretrial detention one week before the Christmas Holidays. Mos said the Landsrecherche is finishing the final draft report on the Piranah Investigation. At the time Shigemoto was arrested, Mos said the former Minister was suspected of fraud, forgery, and he was also suspected of breaking government rules while paying double for services provided by Global Advisory Services.
It should be noted that prior to the arrest of Shigemoto the Chief Financial Officer and co-Manager of WINAIR Roberto Gibbs was also arrested for fraud, money laundering, and forgery. Roberto Gibbs is the owner of Global Advisory Services and his company was used to provide workers for government. Mos told SMN News in earlier interviews that Gibbs double charged government for the services he provided.
While it was widely rumored that the Piranha investigation started when former head of finance Bas Roorda provided lots of information to the Prosecutor’s office claiming that several top civil servants and former commissioner were involved in abusing government funds, only now the Prosecutor’s Office chose to investigate the cases and at least two arrests were made. Another person whose name made the headlines and was even suspended from her job is the former Head of the Tourist Office Regina Labega and her colleague Edward Dest. The Prosecutor’s Office started that investigation early last year but somehow they stopped it claiming they do not have the financial experts available to them to continue the investigation. When SMN News contacted Mos about this he said that the services of SOAB was hired to finalize the financial part of the investigation but to date nothing more has been said about the investigation.
LAST UPDATED ( WEDNESDAY, 30 JANUARY 2013 01:12 )
EXTORTION!!! Dutch Judge ordered: – Sign false/untrue document or USD 500 000.00(five hundred thousand US Dollars) penalty!
Open Letter
Application
On the subject of: EXTORTION and FORGERIES in the Courthouse of Sint Maarten!
Before the Applicants present the facts they would like to declare the following: Since Feb.24.2011 up to date- March.31.2013 the Applicants believe that Judge R.W.J. van Veen is responsible for the acts of EXTORTION and severe destruction of the Rule of Law in the Courtrooms of the Court of First Instance Sint Maarten and not Judge C.T.M.Luijks (as appear below)!
Statement of the facts
Facts
1. The First Applicant (Evmolpia Private Foundation) is registered and functioning in Sint Maarten (Exhibit 1-Please go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtveHdwN0Q3VWoyZ2c/edit?usp=sharing ).
2. The Second Applicant (Yordan S. Busarov) is a Bulgarian citizen, living and working in Sint Maarten since year 2 000(Exhibit 2- Please go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtveVdKc2haLUtucTA/edit?usp=sharing ). Both Applicants are referred below as The Applicants.
3. Judge Mr. R.W.J.van Veen is the Vice-President of the Joint Court of Justice of Aruba, Curacao, Sint Maarten and of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba (the Court), President of the Supervisory Board of Pointe Blanche Prison Sint Maarten, Senior Judge in the Court of First Instance Sint Maarten and Vice-Chairman in the stichting Beroepsopleiding Advocatuur of St. Maarten (SBA SXM).
4. In year 2010 the Applicants started Bodemprocedure 184/2010 aiming to annul false Mortgage Deeds for USD 1 670 000.00 (one million six hundred and seventy thousand US Dollars) attached to the property of the First Applicant(Foundation without Bank Accounts)!
5. On 28.Jan. 2011 one person (part of a unlawful organization specialized in Forgery, Mortgage Fraud, Money Laundering and Tax Evasion) started KG 10/2011 with unconstitutional request! This person submitted to the Court of First Instance Sint Maarten an untrue document (Exhibit 3 -“PRODUCTIE 5”Please go to : http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvNmhDUEE2TXE5RG8/edit?usp=sharing ) and requested the Court of First Instance of Sint Maarten to order to The Applicants to sign this false document, or penalty USD 10 000.00 PER DAY! The Court Case KG 10/2011 was handled from the Judge Mr. C.T.M.Luijks!
6. On Feb.24.2011 The Applicants received(personally from Judge R.W.J.van Veen) provisionally enforceable judgment #16 (“vonnis”- Exhibit 4-Please go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvSmxPME55ZEs5Mk0/edit?usp=sharing ) Please read the last page- “beslissing”!In this judgment the Judge Mr. C.T.M.Luijks ordered to The Applicants to sign (against their will and conscience) untrue document (Exhibit 3/“PRODUCTIE 5”) and forbid to The Applicants any further attempts to receive Proper Administration of Justice, under a threat of a penalty USD 5 000.00(FIVE THOUSAND US Dollars) PER DAY, up-to USD 500 000.00(five hundred thousand US Dollars)! The Applicants will not comment at this time the fact that this provisionally enforceable “vonnis” was not signed, not registered..etc, in breach of Wetboek van Burgerlijke Rechtsvordering/RvAfdeling 4. Het algemeen register, het proces-verbaal van de zitting en vonnissen in het algemeen Artikel 45naar Articel 68(Rv)!
7. Someone from the Court House of Sint Maarten decided that USD 500 000.00(five hundred thousand US Dollars) it is not sufficient threat for extortion and few days later The Applicants were summoned with different/forged “vonnis/eerste grosse – In naam Der Koningin”/Exhibit 5-Please go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvNnZSNkxwS1pvTDg/edit?usp=sharing !In this “eerste grosse” the penalty was increased up to USD 1 000 000.00(one million USDollars)!Please read the last page- “beslissing”!
8. The Applicants informed the Chief-Prosecutor of Sint Maarten Mr. Hans Mos and requested investigation and prosecution of the perpetrator(s)! On May.03.2011 the request was rejected (Exhibit 6 Please go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvd01Gdk1VUVBWV2s/edit?usp=sharing ).
9. After the humiliating and degrading Judgment/“vonnis” to KG 10/2011, The Applicants submitted request for disqualification of Judge Mr. C.T.M.Luijks in the Proceedings on the merits (Bodemprocedure) AR 19/2010. Ten minutes before the hearing the to this request (on May.06.2011) The Applicants were called in the reception of the Court and received letter from Judge R.W.J.van Veen, explaining that the forged “eerste grosse” it is a negligence (Exhibit 7 Please go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvNUVpMTNfeFJMRzA/edit?usp=sharing ).
10. In the hearing to the request for disqualification the Applicants received personally from Judge Mr. C.T.M.Luijks a document with his original signature ( Exhibit 8/Please go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvMUZmdzVBMzJXT0U/edit?usp=sharing ).
11. After the hearing to the request for disqualification the Applicants received personally from Judge R.W.J.van Veen different copy of the “eerste grosse”Exhibit 9-Pleae go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvQXNZNW90aWFHTms/edit?usp=sharing . Even for “unarmed eye” it is obvious that the signature on the “eerste grosse”Exhibit 8 it is “poor” imitation of the original signature of the Judge Mr. CTM.Luijks-Exhibit 9! Please compare the signatures on Exhibit 8 and Exhibit 9.
12. With irrefutable evidences “in hand” the Applicants once again informed/contacted the Chief-Prosecutor of Sint Maarten Mr. Hans Mos and requested investigation and prosecution of the perpetrator(s)! The request was rejected without any justified reason! After the refusal of Chief-Prosecutor Mr. Hans Mos to investigate extortion and forgery in the Courthouse of Sint Maarten, the Applicants submitted complaint against Mr. Hans Mos to the Voorzitter college van procureurs-generaal Mr. H.J. Bolhaar . The Complaint was forwarded to the Procureur-generaal Dhr. Dick Piar (Exhibit 10/Please go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvcmlmclVjRFBNM3c/edit?usp=sharing .
13. The Procureur-generaal Dhr. Dick Piar not only refuse to examine the compelling evidences, The Procureur-generaal Dhr. Dick Piar ordered to the Chief Prosecutor Mr. Hans Mos “not to answer those letters/petitions any more” Exhibit 11/Please go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvTlEySlE5NlY3MEE/edit?usp=sharing .
14. After the Openbaar Ministerie (OM) refuse to investigate the forgeries in the Court House of Sint Maarten, The Applicants were summoned(on April.05.2011 and Aug.23.2011) with a claims in total amount of USD 480 000.00(FOUR HUNDRED AND EIGHTY THOUSAND US Dollars) Exhibit 12/Please go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvVGZRb0hpVE5VdWs/edit?usp=sharing .
15. Judge R.W.J.van Veen used those claims(submitted as productie 9) in EJ 21/2012 to “declare” the First Applicant “Bankrupt”, to order the illegal imprisonment of the Applicants and the illegal lifetime Home-detention! Please find details about the illegal imprisonment and the illegal lifetime Home-detention of the Applicants after the questions below (in the Open Letter/e-mail send on March.26.2013)!
16. The Applicants would like to establish the fact that all and above it is happerning with the knowledge of of Hare Majesteit de Koningin, de Gouverneur van Sint Maarten Dhr Eugene Bernard Holiday, de Minister van Veiligheid en Justitie Dhr Ivo Opstelten, de President van de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden Dhr. G.J.M. Corstens, de Procureur-Generaal bij de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden Dhr J.W.Fokkens, Plaatsvervangend Procureur-Generaal Mw. C. L. de Vries Lentsch-Kostense, de Voorzitter college van procureurs-generaal Mr. H.J. Bolhaar de Nationale Ombudsman Dhr. Alex Brenninkmeijer ,de Procureur-generaal Dhr. Dick Piar, de Hoofdaanklager Dhr. Hans Mos….etc
The opinion of the Applicants is that the following questions should be asked:
1. How haughty a Judge should be, to abuse the power invested in him and to order to the Applicants to sign false document under a threat of USD500 000.00 (half million US Dollars)?
2. How contemptuous a Judge should be, to abuse the power invested in him and to forbid to the Applicants to request Proper Administration of Justice under a threat of USD500 000.00 (half million US Dollars)?
3. How overbearing a Judge should be, to abuse the power invested in him and to order the illegal imprisonment and the illegal lifetime Home-detention of the Applicants?
4. How can be possible everyone within the Kingdom of the Netherlands to be “blind and deaf” for the extortions, forgeries, ill treatments, illegal punishments, acts of arbitrariness, acts of direct coercion, flagrant acts of intimidation and severe destruction of the fundamental human rights in the Courtrooms of the Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie?
5. Is it the Openbaar Ministerie (OM) operating and functional?
6. Is it the landelijke leiding van het Openbaar Ministerie(College van procureurs-generaal in Den Haag) operating and functional?
7. Is it the office of de Procureur-Generaal bij de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden operating and functional?
8. Why the Kingdom Laws exist if the competent authorities(above) refuse to assure the implementation of those Laws and act as they do not exist(Rijksbesluit rechtspositie Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie Artikel 53naar Artikel 64, Wet op de rechterlijke organisatie (Wet RO) Artikel 13 naar Artikel 13h, Rijkswet Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie Artikel 29, Artikel 32, Artikel 33, Artikel en 34)?
9. How can be possible extortion to be performed “In naam Der Koningin”?
10. For how long the extortions, forgeries, ill treatments and illegal punishments(mentioned above and below) in the Courtrooms of the Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie will continue?
I hereby declare that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information I have given in the present application form is correct.
Respectfully: Y.Busarov (Second Applicant).
On his behalf and on behalf of Evmolia PF (First Applicant),
Place: Sint Maarten.
Date; March.31.2013.
Cell: +1721 587 3007
e-mail: jordan@caribserve.net
p.s.
Please read below about: how Judge R.W.J.van Veen used the claims mentioned above (-Please go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvVGZRb0hpVE5VdWs/edit?usp=sharing ) in EJ 21/2012 and “declare” the First Applicant “Bankrupt”, ordered the illegal imprisonment of the Applicants and the illegal lifetime Home-detention, or find printable signed copy of the e-mail(s)/Application(s) here: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvZ2xZTWNzTDM4d2s/edit?usp=sharing .
Open Letter
Application
On the subject of: Illegal imprisonment and illegal lifetime Home-detention, aiming to “cover up” Forgery, Mortgage Fraud, Money Laundering and Tax Evasion within the jurisdiction of the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
Hereby the Applicants informs Your Honorable Members of the Dutch Judiciary, Government, Government and Non- Government organizations/institutions and the Press, guardians of the Rule of Law and fundamental human rights as follows:
Statement of the facts
Facts
17. Before 10.10.2010 Sint Maarten was part of the Netherlands Antilles. With effect from 10 October 2010, the Netherlands Antilles ceased to exist as a part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. From that date onwards, the Kingdom consists of four parts: The Netherlands, Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten.
18. Within the Kingdom, the Netherlands has an obligation to promote the wellbeing of its former colonies, as laid down by the United Nations. The Kingdom of the Netherlands is responsible for the protection of human rights, legal certainty, and good governance in all its constituent countries. On average, the Netherlands has between 22 to 34 Judges and numerous Public prosecutors working in the Caribbean region of the Kingdom. These officials assist and advise the Public Prosecutions Service and the Joint Court of Justice(Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie).
19. The First Applicant (Evmolpia Private Foundation) is registered and functioning in Sint Maarten (Annex 1-Please go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtveHdwN0Q3VWoyZ2c/edit?usp=sharing ).
20. The Second Applicant (Yordan S. Busarov) is a Bulgarian citizen, living and working in Sint Maarten since year 2 000(Annex 2- Please go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtveVdKc2haLUtucTA/edit?usp=sharing ). Both Applicants are referred below as The Applicants.
21. Judge Mrs. Lisabeth Hoefdraad is the President of the Joint Court of Justice of Aruba, Curacao, and Sint Maarten and of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba (the Court), President of the Supervisory Board over the Notaries and Candidate Notaries (Kamer van Toezicht over de Notarissen en Kandidaat-Notarissen) and Knight in the Order of Orange-Nassau.
22. Judge Mr. R.W.J.van Veen is the Vice-President of the Joint Court of Justice of Aruba, Curacao, Sint Maarten and of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba (the Court), President of the Supervisory Board of Pointe Blanche Prison Sint Maarten, Senior Judge in the Court of First Instance Sint Maarten and Vice-Chairman in the stichting Beroepsopleiding Advocatuur of St. Maarten (SBA SXM).
23. Attorney Mr. Ric Bergman is partner in BZSE Law Sint Maarten, Chairman in the stichting Beroepsopleiding Advocatuur of St. Maarten (SBA SXM) and is representing Candidate Civil Law Notary Mrs. Marlene F. Mingo in the pending Appeal Court Case AR 184/2010-H-200/12. Should be noted the fact that the Applicants were illegally arrested on April.13.2912 in the Court House of Sint Maarten and illegally prevented of submitting Closing Arguments in in the pending Appeal Court Case AR 184/2010-H-200/12.
24. The Vice-President of the Court Judge Mr. R.W.J.van Veen and Attorney Mr. Rik (Gerrit Roland) Bergman are sharing the Bank Account(s) of the stichting Beroepsopleiding Advocatuur of St. Maarten (SBA SXM) Please go to http://www.notarysps.com/Lawtrai%20.htm ! How many and were nobody will ever know!
25. On 05.July.2007 and on Feb.26.2009 Standard Trust Company N.V./Corinne de Tullio-Stam (as Managing Director of the First Applicant) signed and registered false/untrue documents. First and Second Mortgage deed with total amount of USD 1 670 000.00(one million six hundred and seventy thousand US Dollars) was attached to the property of the First Applicant/Evmolpia PF. The Applicants would like to establish the fact that the First Applicant/Evmolpia PF does not have and never had a Bank account and it is impossible to receive USD 1 670 000.00(one million six hundred and seventy thousand US Dollars).
26. In the beginning of March 2010 The Applicants filed Complaint to the Supervisory Board over the Notaries and Candidate Notaries in the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba (Kamer van Toezicht over de Notarissen en Kandidaat-Notarissen in de Nederlandse Antillen en Aruba), against the illegal activities of Notary F.E. Gijsbertha and Candidate Civil Law Notary Mr. Marlene Mingo, as required by the Law on the notarial profession, Chapter VI. Supervision (Wet op het notarisambt Hoofdstuk VI. Toezicht). The Complaint was registered on March.22.2010. (Annex 3-Please go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvZkRzZXdDT0RXeEU/edit?usp=sharing ).
27. Since March22.2010 – up to date March.26.2013 The Applicants informed dozens of times the President of the Supervisory Board over the Notaries and Candidate Notaries (President van de Kamer van Toezicht over de Notarissen en Kandidaat-Notarissen) Mrs. L. Hoefdraad of the illegal activities in Notary Office Gijsbertha, and each time filed via (FedEx, e-mails and faxes) dozens of new compelling evidence . Since March.23.2010 – up to date –March.27.2013the Complaint is not handled, in breach of the Law on the notarial profession, Chapter VI. Supervision; Article 53 to Article 65a (Wet op het notarisambt Hoofdstuk VI. Toezicht; Artikel 53 naar Artikel 65a WN of Wna).
28. With the feeling of impunity on Sep.12.2011the fraudulent Candidate Civil Law Notary Mrs. Marlene F. Mingo summoned the Applicants (without a Court Order and in breach of all applicable Laws), presenting herself as a Notary(Annex 4-Please go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvSUlfOHVUVzQySkk/edit?usp=sharing )!
29. Up to Jan.10.2012 the total amount of the untrue/false Mortgage Deeds (attached to a Private Foundation without Bank Account/The First Applicant) was USD 1 670 000.00 (one million six hundred and seventy thousand US Dollars) Annex 5-Please go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvSkY1YW1felhjU2c/edit?usp=sharing .
30. With the feeling of impunity on Jan.10.2012the former Notary F.E.Gisbertha illegally “transferred” five (of seven) apartments (property of The First Applicant) for USD 550 000.00 Annex 6-Please go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvdUIwRVRRWThPdFE/edit?usp=sharing .
31. On Jan.11.2012 the five hundred and fifty thousand US Dollars) “paid” for the five apartments disappeared, and the total amount of the untrue Mortgage Deeds was illegally increased with USD 835 000.00 (eight hundred thirty five thousand US Dollars) penalty, – from USD 1 670 000.00 up-to USD 2 505 000.00(two million five hundred and five thousand US Dollars) Annex 7-Please go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvX0tZOWdfS0htclU/edit?usp=sharing .
32. In fact, the fraudulent former Notary F.E.Gisbertha and fraudulent Candidate Civil Law Notary Mr. Marlene F. Mingo not only “transferred” five apartments (property of The First Applicant), but also added USD 835 000.00(eight hundred and thirty five thousand US Dollars) interest/penalty. Please compare the total amounts in Annex 5 and Annex 7.
33. On April.13.2012, based on untrue/forged document (“vonnis” to EJ 20/2012 – Annex 8-Please go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvUFhkRk9lMXZSUTg/edit?usp=sharing ) to a not-existing Court Case the Applicants were arrested in the Court House of Sent Maarten, prevented of submitting Closing Arguments in in the pending Appeal Court Case AR 184/2010-H-200/12 and after ten minutes in the Police Station send directly to Pointe Blanche Prison Sint Maarten (Annex 9-Pleasevgo to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvNVlfMlBWV3kwZHc/edit?usp=sharing )!
34. On April.26.2012 Judge Mr.R.W.J. van Veen on his own initiative acknowledged the existence of Article 5 of ECHR, and ordered the release of The Applicants (Annex 10-Please go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvSUw0QnBpcy1lVHc/edit?usp=sharing ) under lifetime Home-detention!
35. In fact on March.28.2012 (Annex 9) article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights was not applicable and Judge Mr.R.W.J. van Veen ordered the imprisonment of The Applicants. One month later on April.26.2012 Article 5 of the European Convention Human on Rights was applicable and Judge Mr.R.W.J. van Veen suspended the imprisonment of the Second Applicant, and in breach of all Domestic and International Laws ordered the illegal Home-detention of the Applicants for indefinite period of time(Annex 10).
36. Since April.26.2012 up to date-March.26.2013 (for eleven months and counting) the Applicants are under illegal lifetime Home Detention!
37. The Applicants would like to establish the fact that all and above it is happening with the knowledge of Hare Majesteit de Koningin, de Gouverneur van Sint Maarten Dhr Eugene Bernard Holiday, de Minister van Veiligheid en Justitie Dhr Ivo Opstelten, de President van de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden Dhr. G.J.M. Corstens, de Procureur-Generaal bij de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden Dhr J.W.Fokkens, Plaatsvervangend Procureur-Generaal Mw. C. L. de Vries Lentsch-Kostense, de Nationale Ombudsman Dhr. Alex Brenninkmeijer ,de Procureur-generaal Dhr. Dick Piar, de Hoofdaanklager Dhr. Hans Mos….etc!
38. The Dutch Judges are appointed by Royal Decree for life. They are dismissed by Royal Decree at their own request or when reaching the age of 70 years. The President of the Court Judge Mrs. L.Hoefdraad (born 1951) will retire at age 62 effective Aug.2013!
39. The Vice-President Judge Mr. R.W.J.van Veen will also no-longer be part of Joint Court of Justice of Aruba, Curacao, and Sint Maarten and of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba effective Aug.2013!
40. According to the knowledge of the Applicants, the Chief-Prosecutor Mr. Hans Mos will no-longer part of the Prosecutors Office Sint Maarten effective Aug.2013!
41. On March.23.2013 one of the local newspaper informed the publicity as follows:
Candidate Civil Law Notary Mrs. Marlene F.Mingo will be taking over the office of notary Francis Gijsbertha ….on April.05.2013…etc Annex 11-Please go to: http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvd3dPY3p3NmJNdVk/edit?usp=sharing )
42. It is a fact that the Members of the Judiciary do not enjoy immunity from prosecution. They are subject to the ordinary rules of criminal law, but with one exception. To guarantee that the prosecution and trial of a judge are fair, there is a special statutory regulation for determining which court is competent to judge such a case. The aim is to ensure that judges are not tried in the court in which they serve.
43. “On the other hand” in the past fifty years, the Supreme Court has rarely suspended a judge and has dismissed a judge only twice. In 2008 because of illness of the judge concerned and in 2009, due to the incapacity of the concerned judge for work, due to other reasons than illness Please go to http://www.rechtspraak.nl/Organisatie/Hoge-Raad/Supreme-court/The-Procurator-General-of-the-Supreme-Court/Pages/Disciplinary-measures-and-complaints-against-judges.aspx .
44. On March.23.2013 one of the local newspaper informed the publicity as follows:
Candidate Civil Law Notary Mrs. Marlene F.Mingo will be taking over the office of notary Francis Gijsbertha ….on April.05.2013…etc. Annex 11 !
45. As mentioned above, the Second Applicant is with Bulgarian nationality! It is a fact that, The Netherlands has been vetoing the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Schengen Area since September 2011 out of concerns for corruption, organized crime, and rule of law in the youngest EU member states. The Dutch government has confirmed the Netherlands’ veto on Bulgaria and Romania’s Schengen entry in a briefing to the Dutch MPs (Dutch News reported Sep.2012).
The opinion of the Applicants is that the following questions should be asked:
46. Why instead investigated and prosecuted, former Notary F.E.Gijsbertha was appointed “to represent his vacant practice location” and continue with the Forgeries, Mortgage Fraud, Money Laundering and Tax Evasion?
47. Why instead investigated and prosecuted, Candidate Civil Law Notary Mrs. Marlene F. Mingo will be sworn as Notary on April.05.2013 and continue with Forgeries, Mortgage Fraud, Money Laundering and Tax Evasion- http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_PuZLSZIKtvd3dPY3p3NmJNdVk/edit?usp=sharing ?
48. Why is necessary Candidate Civil Law Notary Mrs. Marlene F. Mingo to be sworn as Notary, after she is acting as such and signing documents/summons as Notary since Sep.12.2011?
49. How Candidate Civil Law Notary Mrs. Marlene F. Mingo will “repay” for the favor (appointed as a Notary instead investigated)?
50. Is it any Government Institution capable of “breaking” this endless circle of continuing destruction of the Rule of Law and fundamental human rights?
51. How many others (specialized in Forgeries, Mortgage Fraud, Money Laundering and Tax Evasion) will be sworn before the President of the Court (Mrs. L.Hoefdraad) retire and before the “departure” of the Vice-President(Mr. R.W.J.van Veen)?
52. How can be possible the victims of criminal activities to be imprisoned and/or placed under lifetime Home-detention for requesting Proper Administration of Justice?
53. Is it a common practice the Dutch Judges to share Bank Accounts with Attorneys (of “white collar criminals” or any criminals) -http://www.notarysps.com/Lawtrai%20.htm ?
54. Is it the Joint Court of Justice(Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie) “the heir” of the Tribunal of the Holy Office of the Inquisition(Spanish Inquisition), profiting from “confiscation” of the property of “convicted heretics”/The Applicants?
55. Why the Honorable Governor of Sint Maarten Mr. Eugene Bernard Holiday refuse to assure (for over a year- since Feb.13.2012) the implementation of the Kingdom Laws (Rijksbesluit rechtspositie Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie Artikel 53 to Artikel 64)?
56. Why the de Procureur-Generaal bij de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden is “blind and deaf” for the severe destruction of the Rule of Law?
57. Why the Member of the Constitutional Court of Sint Maarten and Vice-President of the Court(Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie) Honorable Judge Mr. Jan de Boer is “blind and deaf” for the severe destruction of the Rule of Law?
58. Is it the ill treatment, illegal punishments, acts of arbitrariness, acts of direct coercion, flagrant acts of intimidation and severe destruction of the fundamental human rights against/of the Applicants the only way to protect the image and the trust in the Dutch Judiciary?
59. Is it the illegal imprisoned and/or illegal lifetime Home-detention example for the Bulgarian and Romanian Judges and Attorney-Generals?
60. Is it the intentionally inflicted severe mental suffering, the illegal punishments (aiming to “cover up” criminal activities within the jurisdiction of the Kingdom of the Netherlands) example for Proper Administration of Justice for the Bulgarian and Romanian Judges and Attorney-Generals?
61. Why the competent authorities are placing above the applicable Laws the President of the Court (Mrs. L.Hoefdraad) and Vice-President(Mr. R.W.J.van Veen) and refusing to investigate the severe destruction of the Rule of Law and fundamental human rights?
62. How all and above can be possible in 21th Century within the jurisdiction of the one of the founding Members of the Council of Europe and ECHR?
63. Is it not the improper behavior of the President of the Court (Mrs. L.Hoefdraad) and Vice-President(Mr. R.W.J.van Veen) one of the main reasons Curacao and Sint Maarten to be considered as Countries/Jurisdictions of Primary Concern in the report of the U.S. Department of State 2013(Please go to http://www.state.gov/j/inl/rls/nrcrpt/2013/vol2/204062.htm )?
64. What will be the next illegal punishment on the Applicants for requesting Proper Administration of Justice, speaking the truth and asking questions-Death Penalty?
65. Is it the ill treatment, illegal punishments, acts of arbitrariness, acts of direct coercion, flagrant acts of intimidation and severe destruction of the fundamental human rights against/of the Petitioners the only way to protect the image and the trust in the Dutch Judiciary?
66. Is it not an obligation on the judicial authorities themselves not to engage in any prohibited behavior, such as in the imposition of an illegal punishment?
67. Is it not an overriding obligation for the judicial authorities to investigate allegations (and evidences) of illegal punishments?
Personal liberty is a fundamental condition, which everyone should generally enjoy. Deprivation of liberty is something that is also likely to have a direct and adverse effect on the enjoyment of many of the other rights, ranging from the right to family and private life, through the right to freedom of assembly, association and expression to the right to freedom of movement. Furthermore, any deprivation of liberty will invariably put the person affected into an extremely vulnerable position, exposing him or her to the risk of being subjected to torture and inhuman and degrading treatment. If the refusal of the judicial authorities to investigate is aiming to protect the image and the trust of/in the Dutch Judiciary, the effect is inverse! The Applicants strongly believe that every reasonable person (after having verified the accuracy of the facts and their legal interpretation) will condemn all and above for unacceptable and damaging the image, the trust and the reputation of any Judiciary!
Copies of dozens (if not hundreds) compelling evidences undoubtedly proving the statements above will be send by post/FedEx (upon request)!
To read about: in belastingparadijs Nederland koestert men ook het meest corrupte rechtssysteem ter wereld en zie de lijst van organisaties die werden geïnformeerd over die rechterlijke valsheid in geschrifte please go to http://www.sdnl.nl/actueel.htm (stichting Sociale Databank Nederland) .
Respectfully: Y.Busarov.(Second Applicant).
On behalf of Evmolia PF(First Applicant).
Sint Maarten.
Pingback: for clevie arrindell: Election Fraud Case Now Moving Forward — Mos. was THIS the investigation you were talking about? from SMN-NEWS.COM | STMAARTENNEWS.COM
Pingback: for clevie arrindell: Election Fraud Case Now Moving Forward — Mos. was THIS the investigation you were talking about? from SMN-NEWS.COM | SXMPOLITICO